Acme call prep
2m ago
Follow-up: TechVentures
1h ago
Objection handling
Yesterday
Acme call prep
๐ค Sales Agent ยท 3 members
/prep-call Acme Corp โ they care about compliance and security
Here's your call prep for Acme Corp:
Key priorities: Compliance-first procurement, SOC 2 certification, data residency requirements.
Framing: Lead with your enterprise security posture. They'll ask about audit logs and RBAC โ have those ready.
Likely objections: Pricing vs. existing tools, integration complexity.
Can you draft a follow-up email for after the call?
The problem isn't that your team uses AI.
It's that they each use their own.
Your sales rep has their own prompts. Your marketer does things their way. The new hire is guessing. And none of it is shared.
AI makes individuals faster, but the team stays fragmented โ inconsistent output, duplicated effort, and no one quite sure what "good" looks like for the group. Everyone's busy. Nothing compounds.
One shared agent per team โ loaded with your context, your skills, your way of working. Every member starts from the same place. AI that compounds, not just for you, but for the whole team.
Not your AI. Your team's AI.
Every agent is shared across the team. When one person figures out the best approach, everyone gets that. AI that compounds โ for the whole team.
Paste your URL
Sanity reads your website and understands your business. One input. No forms, no onboarding calls.
Agents are built per team
Sales gets a sales agent. Marketing gets a marketing agent. Each one pre-loaded with your context and skills.
The whole team shares it
Anyone on the team uses the same agent โ same quality, same context, from day one. No private setups.
Every member of Sales works with the same agent โ same context, same skills, same quality.
Built for teams, not individuals.
Every feature is designed around one question: does the whole team benefit?
Everyone works with the same agent โ the same workflows, the same context, the same quality. No private setups. No tribal knowledge locked in someone's personal tab.
Each agent comes ready with workflows for your team's function. Sales gets outreach, deal research, objection prep. Marketing gets briefs, copy, competitor analysis.
When someone moves on, what they knew doesn't walk out the door. The context, the reasoning, the way your team works โ it stays in the agent, available to everyone.
Sales, Marketing, Product, Customer Success โ each gets their own focused agent, all under one company workspace. Everyone moving in the same direction.
Give the agent your documents, past decisions, and lessons learned. It carries all of it into every conversation โ no one's starting from scratch.
Each agent comes pre-loaded for your team's function. You're running in minutes, and it gets sharper as the team uses it. No configuration required.
Your best people can't be in every conversation.
But your team's best thinking can.
When everyone works from the same agent, the gap between your strongest performer and the rest gets smaller โ naturally, every day. That's not just efficiency. That's a team that gets better as a whole.
What teams say
"Our whole team preps calls the same way now. Same research, same framing, same quality โ whether it's a senior rep or someone in their second month."
"The new copywriter was producing on-brand content in their first week. They didn't need to learn our voice โ the agent already had it."
"When our most experienced rep left, we were nervous. Three months later, the team handles everything they handled. The agent kept their context."
Common questions
So does everyone. The difference is yours is fragmented โ each person doing it their own way, none of it shared. One agent per team changes that.
Each agent comes pre-loaded for your team's function. You're running in minutes, and it gets sharper as the team uses it.
Free to start. No per-seat pricing.
We built Sanity because we were the team that needed it. Every decision was made with one question: would a real team actually use this, every day?